New Fruit/Vegetable Coating – Apeel Sciences..Make Your Food More Appealing?? Don’t Be Duped.

Apeel sciences, apeel dangers, apeel what is it,

If you see this label on your food and produce…..RUN!

Apeel is a food coating technology developed by Apeel Sciences, a California-based company. The coating is made from plant-derived materials and is designed to extend the shelf life of fruits and vegetables. It forms a protective layer around the produce, reducing water loss and slowing down the natural process of decay.

Well, that all sounds quite lovely, doesn’t it? But, let’s look more closely at this. After all its supported by the Melinda and Bill Gates foundation, which should make your yellow alerts go off instantaneously.

And..it’s being put on organic foods, so you can’t trust the ‘organic’ label anymore. Ugh.

Let’s look at the first problem. They are saying it’s ‘plant-based’ which for most people would make them feel fine about it. But remember…petroleum is plant-based. It’s also the source of all plastics, and we all know how well that worked!

So this coating is supposedly made of mono and diglycerides…which are (fat based sugars) which are the go-to replacement for deadly trans fats and a food industry staple that helps keep oil and fat from separating. In fact it’s a byproduct of oil processing, including partially hydrogenated canola and soybean oils, neither of which are ‘good’ fats. This additive is a byproduct of oil processing which contains artificial trans fat – a very dangerous food ingredient known to cause coronary heart disease and linked to some 50,000 fatal heart attacks per year in the U.S. alone.

Just a note here, the FDA in 2016 finally acknowledged that trans fats a not safe, but…changed their labeling to mono and diglycerides to fit their agenda. Gee, who would have thought???

Can you wash it off? Nope! You might scrub a bit off, but definitely not all without damaging the fruit or vegetable. Apeel forms a barrier to keep water in and ‘freshness’ in, so it would be useless if it could be washed off. Great. (Insert eye-roll here.)

Some of the concerns people have raised:

1. Environmental impact: Some argue that Apeel’s widespread use could contribute to an increase in single-use plastic waste. This is because Apeel coatings are often applied to individual fruits and vegetables, leading to additional packaging.

2. Organic certification: Apeel has faced criticism from organic farmers and organizations who claim that its use could compromise the integrity of organic produce. There are concerns that the coating could hinder the natural exchange of gases and moisture that occurs in fresh produce, potentially affecting their organic status. Note here…they are managing to get around ‘organic’ rules and adding it to organic produce.

3. Market consolidation: There have been concerns about the concentration of power in the food industry, as Apeel has secured partnerships with major retailers and produce suppliers. Critics argue that such consolidation may limit choices for consumers and smaller-scale farmers.

You’ll find Apeel products in places like Costco, Trader Joes, Gelsons, Ralphs, Sprouts, Vons, Walmart, Whole Foods, Kroger, Harps Foods, Wakefern brand stores including Price Right, Fairway Market, Target, Bristol Farms and more. Some of the produce companies using Apeel are Topline, Index Fresh, Calve, Del Monte, West Park, Horton Fruit Co, Del Ray Avocado, Natures Pride and more.

As for the supporters and proponents of Apeel, the company has gained significant backing from various organizations, including:

1. Investors: Apeel Sciences has received substantial investments from prominent entities, including the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Andreessen Horowitz, and the Rockefeller Foundation.

2. Retailers and suppliers: Apeel has formed partnerships with major retailers and produce suppliers, such as Kroger, Walmart, and Del Monte (see above). These companies have shown support for Apeel’s technology and have integrated it into their supply chains.

It’s well known that with time a produce’s nutrition value drops. So will you be able to tell how old your food is? Nope. Look at these images of a 31 day old avocado, with and without Apeel. Is that what you want to eat? I seriously doubt it!

Apeel sciences, apeel bill gates, apeel reviews, apeel dangers.

Rebuttal For Garbage Covid Science by Fisman That Legacy Media All Jumped On

On April 25, 2022, many Canadian news outlets (mainstream media) ran articles titled similar to these:

Global News:
Unvaccinated people increase risk of COVID-19 infection among vaccinated: study

By Irelyne Lavery Global News
Posted April 25, 2022 12:01 am

CP24:
Mixing with unvaccinated increases COVID-19 risk for vaccinated people, study finds

The Toronto Star:
Remaining unvaccinated increases risk to the vaccinated, says U of T COVID study
Research in CMAJ finds the modelling holds true even when vaccination rates are high.

By Megan Ogilvie Health Reporter
May Warren Staff Reporter
Kenyon Wallace Investigative Reporter

And SHAME on them for these lying, deceitful reports on covid science, according to Dr. Bryam Bridle of the University of Guelph. Before we get started, who is Dr. Bridle? Here is part of his CV:

He is an Associate Professor of Viral Immunology in the Department of Pathobiology at the University of Guelph. He specializes in vaccinology and is also leader of the Vaccine Task Force of the Canadian COVID Care Alliance’s Scientific and Medical Advisory Committee.

More of Dr Bridle’s qualifications and evidence of expert status can be read at the end of this article. To say the least, he is FAR more qualified to comment on the Fisman paper (which the news articles above are referring to) than any journalist, touting the government and ‘bought and paid-for’ medical types.

His article completely refuting the articles in the legacy media is entitled “Fiction Disguised As Science To Promote Hatred” Click on that link to read the whole article or you can download it Here

Dr Bridle starts his article with:

“The legacy media has been like pigs at a trough today and yesterday with the publication of an atrocious ‘peer-reviewed’ ‘scientific’ article by Dr. David Fisman, Dr. Ashleigh Tuite, and a graduate student. After all, with raw public health data unable to support the only COVID-19 narrative that has been deemed acceptable, fresh fuel was apparently needed. Lots of media outlets have been reporting on this study; one of them being CTV News. Here is the headline for their article:

“Being with unvaccinated people increases COVID-19 risk for those who are vaccinated: modelling study”

This kind of messaging will only fuel hatred and segregation and the potential development of harmful policies. And it is all in the name of bad science.”

Obviously, you can read the article, but let me outline a few of the more important points:

1) Fisman was quoted by CTV News as saying “We thought what was missing from that conversation was, what are the rights of vaccinated people to be protected from unvaccinated people?”. The only reason why Fisman is trying to turn people against other people is due to the abject failure of the COVID-19 ‘vaccines’ to function like vaccines. That is to say that the purpose of a vaccine is to protect people from a pathogen; to prevent both the disease and transmission of the causative agent. Such a medical product does not require one to pit people against people. This ‘vaccine’ has done neither.

2) “antivaccine sentiment, fuelled in part by organized disinformation efforts, has resulted in suboptimal uptake of readily available vaccines”.

In fact, the article by Fisman, et al. represents one of the most egregious examples of disinformation that Dr Bridle has ever seen.

Most of the people that remain ‘unvaccinated’ are not ‘anti-vaccine’ by any stretch of the imagination. Due to critical thinking and following the science, they are not in support of the current crop of COVID-19 jabs. Remember, the definition of a vaccine was changed to accommodate these jabs. They are nothing like any of the historically mandated vaccines, such as those used in the childhood immunization series.

People have been wary because the initial clinical trials to evaluate these ‘vaccines’ are still ongoing, literally meaning the jabs are still in the experimental phase…(much more in the article.)

Dr Bridle refers to this as a major issue because Fisman and his colleagues are labeling people and using subjective argumentation in an attempt to justify it. This sentence in the paper has no place in the world of objective science.

3)“We also assumed that some fraction of the unvaccinated population had immunity at baseline owing to previous infection and that a fraction of the population was vaccinated”. Initially, this seems reasonable. But then one learns that the number plugged into the simple mathematical model was only 20% of the population having naturally acquired immunity. Really?!? After more than two years of living with SARS-CoV-2 and and Delta and Omicron sweeping through Canada, one is to believe that only 20% have immunity? Where is the evidence for this? A paper showing that a vast majority of Canadians might have some degree of naturally acquired or cross-reactive immunity against SARS-CoV-2 can be found here. He feels that even more unvaccinated Canadians would now have natural immunity.

4) “We treated immunity after vaccination as an all-or-none phenomenon, with a fraction of vaccinated people (as defined by vaccine effectiveness) entering the model in the immune state and the remainder being left in the susceptible state. For example, a vaccine that is 80% efficacious would result in 80% of vaccinated people becoming immune, with the remaining 20% being susceptible to infection.”

There are multiple major issues here. First, the COVID-19 ‘vaccines’ fail to confer immunity, which is protection against disease and transmission. It is common knowledge that ‘vaccinated’ people get infected and sick at least as much as, if not more than the ‘unvaccinated’. This is why a desperate emphasis has been placed on the debatable possibility that disease severity is merely dampened by ‘vaccination’. A such, a biologically incorrect assumption was made here.

Also, the effectiveness of the vaccine that was plugged into the model started at 40% and went up from there. However, these high percentages represent relative risk reduction, not absolute risk reduction. Do you remember when we were told that Pfizer’s ‘vaccine’ was 95% effective? That did not mean that 95% of the population was protected against getting COVID-19 (or 80% as used in the example in the paper). That 95% reduction was a relative risk reduction. What many people were not told is that most of the people in Pfizer’s clinical trial never got COVID-19, which is the disease that can occur in some people who get infected with SARS-CoV-2. In fact, the absolute risk reduction at the population level in the study was a mere 0.84% as a result of ‘vaccination’.

As such, it is completely inappropriate for Fisman, et al. to plug values for relative risk reduction into their population-level models and treat them as though they represent absolute risk reduction. Conflating relative versus absolute risk reduction was misleading. As expert epidemiologists the authors must surely know the difference between absolute versus relative risk reduction. This is evidence that what they disseminated was disinformation.

5) “We did not model waning immunity”. Dr Bridle was flabbergasted by this assumption. COVID-19 ‘vaccine’-induced immunity is ridiculously short-lived. In contrast, naturally acquired immunity is much longer-lived. This differential effect would have had a major influence on the outcome of the mathematical model. This assumption by the authors ignores obvious scientific facts.

6) There was no discussion about assumptions with respect to the safety (or lack thereof) of the COVID-19 ‘vaccines’ that might offset the perceived value of ‘vaccination’. Regardless of their viewpoint, they should have discussed this and provided evidence for their stance.

7) “Boosting with mRNA vaccines appears to restore vaccine effectiveness at least temporarily against Omicron”. This is not an accurate assumption to make. The paper that was cited to justify this statement used data derived from a simplistic model in a petri dish. It provided evidence of the presence of SARS-CoV-2-neutralizing antibodies in the blood of people who received COVID-19 booster ‘vaccines’.

However, this lacked a functional context. First, these antibodies were measured in blood, but the virus infects the airways, so the anatomical location that was studied is irrelevant. Second, it is possible that there were non-neutralizing antibodies that could actually enhance disease but no testing was performed to detect these; non-neutralizing antibodies were ignored. There are other issues, but the point is that there was no way of knowing whether the subset of antibodies measured in the cited study would translate into any degree of protection against ‘real world’ infection. This shows a bias by Fisman, et al. in pushing booster doses with the weakest of data to support it.

8) Fisman declared the following competing interests: “David Fisman has served on advisory boards related to influenza and SARS-CoV-2 vaccines for Seqirus, Pfizer, AstraZeneca and Sanofi-Pasteur Vaccines”! These seem like inappropriate conflicts of interest, especially in light of the major flaws in his paper. In combination, these are suggestive of an inappropriate bias in judgement.

There is so much more in the paper, which I highly recommend you read.

In the section: Proof that the Paper by Fisman, et al. Should be Retracted Immediately, Dr Bridle takes the actual date from Fisman’s study and plugs in the proper numbers as mentioned above. It results in a complete negating of Fisman’s claims. So abhorrent.

As Dr Bridle concludes: Correcting only this one assumption completely reverses the conclusions of the paper. All of a sudden every ratio drops below ‘1’, meaning that transmission is occurring disproportionately from ‘vaccinated’ people. Now the ‘unvaccinated’ are serving as a protective buffer for the ‘vaccinated’.

Now one must ask how skewed the conclusions of the paper would go in the opposite direction if the several other incorrect assumptions were to be corrected. As you can plainly see, this paper by Fisman, et al. is nothing short of preposterous. How could a paper be allowed to be published in what used to be a respected medical journal when its conclusions get completely reversed when only one of several reasonable corrections are made! The paper by Fisman, et al. is a classic demonstration of ‘garbage in, garbage out’.

So just WHO is getting Covid? Well, this data was taken from the Ministry of Health of Ontario’s own website April 26, 2022. And yep, you got it…the Vaccinated!! Not the Unvaccinated! Why? I explain that on my page here

Messages from Dr Bridle For Those Who Need A Slap Up The Side….

A Direct Message to Fisman, et al.

Fisman and Tuite: Your paper, which can be flipped on its head by correcting just one of your multiple incorrect immunological assumptions, stigmatizes the ‘unvaccinated’ and could potentially be used to justify policies as draconian as forced inoculations. Why are you even promoting messaging based on theoretical models using assumptions that you are not qualified to opine on when concrete scientific evidence about transmission could be generated via biological sampling? You owe Canadians an apology for disseminating harmful disinformation. Should you wish to contest my immunological critiques, I would invite you to arrange a forum where we can have an objective third party moderate a respectful discussion about COVID-19 vaccinology in front of the Canadian public with equal representatives on both sides of the debate.

A Message to the Administration of the University of Toronto

You should launch an investigation into the academic conduct of Drs. Fisman and Tuite.

A Message to the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada

You should investigate Dr. Fisman and the harms that may be caused by his actions as a physician in publishing a misleading scientific paper in a medical journal.

A Message to the Canadian Medical Association Journal

Do the right thing and immediately retract the paper by Fisman, et al. There is a rumour that you may have sent this paper directly to Canadian physicians. If true, make it very clear to them that the paper represented disinformation disseminated by a physician who knows better. You should reconsider future recruitment of the services of the reviewers that promoted the publication of this paper and recommend that their academic institutions review their conduct. You should also review the conduct of your editorial board and peer review process.

A Message to the Legacy Media

Make the right choice and do everything that you can to blunt the profound harms caused by your rampant and widespread dissemination of misinformation. It is promoting hatred against critically thinking people who made highly informed and justified choices to avoid inoculations that are still in their initial clinical experimentation phase and for about which there is profound scientific debate. Protect the people that you have inappropriately placed at risk. You know where it will lead if you promote polarization of two groups of people and fuel feelings of anger and hatred in one of them against the other. Replace journalists with those who are willing to think critically and who will not support censorship of legitimate experts with ‘dissenting’ views. Nor should peer-reviewed scientific papers be treated like the gospel truth. The anonymous peer review process is fallible.

A Message to All Canadians

We are more alike than different. Do not fall into the trap set in the paper by Fisman, et al. to equate ‘likeness’ with ‘vaccination’ status. As an expert vaccinologist who has been closely following the accumulating science and, more importantly, as a fellow human being, I implore you to promote unity.

There are more conclusions to read in Dr. Bridle’s paper and please do so. Most of this article has come from his paper because it could not be said any better. I want to truly thank him for the work he has put into this for the benefit of all Canadians…no, for the benefit of all humankind. Kudos!

Make sure to subscribe to his substack thread to keep informed: Here

My other pages on Covid:
What To Do If You’ve Been Vaxxed And Are Ill: Read Here
More On Vaxx Dangers: Read Here

Bottom Line? Mainstream Media is LYING To You!

Dr Reiner Fuellmich is a German Lawyer who is leading the movement to bring all these criminals to justice in his ‘Crimes Against Humanity’ Campaign. Listen to what he has to say…

 

More on Dr. Bryam Bridle’s Qualifications:
His research program focuses on the development of vaccines to prevent infectious diseases and treat cancers, as well as studying the body’s immune response to viruses. He teaches several courses at the undergraduate and graduate levels on the topics of immunology, virology, and cancer biology. The overall aim of his research efforts is to develop safe and effective new immunotherapies for people. Indeed, one of my previous cancer vaccine strategies progressed into four human clinical trials.

He is also involved in training Canada’s next generation of multidisciplinary researchers, especially in vaccinology. He received funding from the Ontario Government (COVID-19 Rapid Research Fund, Ministry of Colleges and Universities) and the Government of Canada (Pandemic Response Challenge Program, National Research Council of Canada) to conduct pre-clinical research with vaccines against COVID-19. He also holds numerous grants in support of his cancer research and basic viral immunology research programs, including but not limited to the Canadian Institutes for Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Terry Fox Research Institute, Canadian Cancer Society, and Cancer Research Society. He has received numerous teaching and research awards including the prestigious Terry Fox Research Institute’s New Investigator Award and the Zoetis Award for Research Excellence.

Dr Bridle has served as an expert witness for court cases related to the science of COVID-19, including vaccines.

Since the COVID-19 pandemic was declared, He has been actively involved in providing fact-based, balanced, scientific answers to questions posed by the public to help them make fully informed decisions. This has included ~300 media engagements ranging from radio shows, published articles, and appearances on televised news programs, spanning the local to international scope. He has also been an invited keynote speaker at international conferences that focused on COVID-19 and have served as an invited member of numerous COVID-19-focused discussion panels.

Vaccinology is a highly specialized sub-discipline of immunology. He is called upon as an expert in this specialized field to comment on the critical importance of high-quality, well-validated, robustly safety-tested vaccines and he routinely promotes their use. He supports the concept of vaccine mandates in well-defined scenarios. However, the definition of a vaccine had to be altered to allow the term to be applied to the current COVID-19 inoculations, which do not prevent infection, do not prevent disease (i.e, COVID-19), and do not stop transmission of SARS-CoV-2, which is the causative agent of COVID-19. In stark contrast, historically mandated vaccines, including the childhood series, provide robust, very long-lasting protective immunity. These vaccines confer near-sterilizing immunity, which means that people cannot contract the targeted disease, nor can they transmit the targeted pathogen to others. After receiving these true vaccines, individuals not only do not need to be isolated, masked, or practice physical distancing, they are actively encouraged to interact with others. Further, historically mandated vaccines were assessed for adverse events over long periods of time. The current COVID-19 inoculations had proper safety assessments ended after four months. Notably, the six-month update report provided by Pfizer showed that adverse events were higher in the vaccinated group as compared to the placebo-treated controls, and demonstrated only modest absolute effectiveness against the original variant of SARS-CoV-2. The vaccine failed to reduce COVID-related hospitalizations and deaths and is now outdated and irrelevant in the context of the currently circulating variants of SARS-CoV-2.

Based on hundreds of peer-reviewed scientific publications, it is his professional opinion that the risk-benefit profile of SARS-CoV-2 inoculations currently being used around the world demands that mandates for these vaccines be rescinded to avoid exposing any more people, especially youth, to their enhanced risks.

Vaxx Adverse Events

Heath Consequences Of The Covid Vaccine:

I mentioned in my last page here that I would list some unpaid-for actual science on the adverse effects of the vaccine. I and many, many of my colleagues are helping people daily to overcome the health consequences they are experiencing since being jabbed.

This is the best website right now to hear Dr. Reiner Fuellmich’s presentations on the truth behind this pandemic and actual testimony from hundreds of experts: doctors, immunologists, virologists, lawyers, etc testify how this virus is a simple coronavirus, which has been with mankind for some 24,000 years and not the evil killer it has been made out to be. Even the CDC and WHO have admitted it has a 99.9% cure rate, so what is going on??

The best thing to do would be to listen to Fuellmich’s talks on each day, and you will totally be educated.

But one thing that sticks out to me is that he said this whole pandemic could not have happened without numbers. They had to convince people that this innocuous virus was in fact killing people by the droves, and install fear and anxiety in the population to get the world to comply.

So a Dr. Drosten in Germany came up with the plan to use the PCR test. That stands for polymerase chain reaction, which in essence takes elements which the naked eye can’t see and join them together so they are large enough to be studied. A great advantage in a lab, but means nothing as far as deciding infection or rate of infection or even how much infection any person has. Kary Mullis PhD who invented the test (and won a Nobel Prize for it) is quoted and on video as expressly saying, it can NOT tell you anything about infection. That is not its job! But Drosten insisted he had slightly altered it so it could. Which was an outright lie. 

The rest is history, he convinced the WHO to use the PCR test and they declared the rest of the world should too, an so it was.

Here is Dr. Fuellmich’s day of reporting on the PCR test and how much of a huge lie it was/is..

It is long, but well worth it to inform yourself.

I know there are at least 30% of the population who will never believe that the vaccine is riddled with problems and negative health consequences. That’s fine. This is, or should be about choice, so you can believe what you want.

We know there are about 40% of people who are more ‘sitting on the fence’…not sure what to believe as the real science starts to ebb out of the shadows that governments and Big Pharma has tried to keep it. And the final 30% are following the real science and doctors who have watched their patients over the past two years, doing actual lab tests and seeing many of them become intolerably ill or even die.

Lawyer Tom Benz On What’s Happening To The Military

Attorney Tom Renz made worldwide headlines after disclosing explosive data from the Department of Defense DMED database at Senator Ron Johnson’s Second Opinion Hearing. DMED is the official database of the 1.4M active duty DoD servicemen. See the full article Here

What he’s reporting on is the shocking increase in various medical conditions after the military were mandated to take the mRNA vaccine. Here’s the list:

These results are intolerable and criminal. On that page, you can also watch videos of the presentation and an interview with Tom Renz.

Mainstream media or legacy media would have you believe that the vaccines are well tested, effective and safe. Well, the sad news is…they are NOT!  The FDA in the US asked for Pfizer’s research results and they wanted 75 years to present it!! But to their credit, the FDA said nope and demanded 55,000 pages per month. (Again Pfizer tried to only give 500 pages, but the FDA was firm). 

Here is the site where you can read all of those papers. You’re not going to believe how many injuries and deaths occurred, which they knew about, an yet still pushed their vaccine. These papers are only from December 2020 to February 2021! We have so much more to see. Look here at the site  Once there, click on Pfizer Documents.

I’ve already set up a page to inform you about how you can help regain your immunity post-vaxx here

Here is the download to the most important paper, the one which lists all the adverse events starting on page 9 and then from page 30 to the end, the horrific list of health ailments the vaccines cause. Document here

Because of the adverse events in a report, only three months old, there is a lot of talk going on on the internet. Look for videos by Dr. Rober Malone, Dr. Paul Anderson, Dr. Peter McCullough, Dr. Roger Hodkinson, etc. BUT don’t search on Google, it’s so censored now. Use DuckDuckGo and Brave as your browser. You’ll see much better results.

Here’s is one of Dr. Hodkinson’s latest videos:

And that just about sums the whole scam up.

Another quick video is Dr Cole’s opinion of the jabs:

And for a tongue-in-cheek take on Klaus Schwab and what is actually happening behind the scenes, you have to love JP Sears. The thing is, all he’s saying is true. Have a watch:

Places to Subscribe and Learn More:

I’d like to list a few places you can subscribe to, to keep up on real reporting about this so called pandemic and more importantly, the jab. So here are a few of my trusted ones:

The Vigilant Fox: They publish very good videos every day if you subscribe here  

This link will take you to their channel at Rumble and from there you can also follow them on Twitter, Telegram Gettr and Truthsocial

Dr Trozzi: drtrozzi.org. He has a great site, with up-to-date info on all things covid. You can subscribe to his daily email there, which I find really good.

This gal at: https://covidtruefacts.blogspot.com/2022/  updates her blog everyday with very good videos.

The Defender: Children’s Health Defense by Robert F Kennedy Jr.  https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/

I know main stream media gives him a rough time, but in fact he’s one of the few who actually are brave enough to print the truth.  Don’t forget, many media networks are ultimately owned by Blackrock or Vanguard, the two largest corporations in the world. Both tied to the World Economic Forum, headed by Klaus Schwab.  And that’s another huge story, which JP Sears talks about in the above video and  I’ll talk about next time.

Don’t forget to check the previous page out to help yourself and your family/friends recover from this heinous shot. It’s here

Sign Up For Dr Deb’s Newsletter:

[grwebform url=”https://app.getresponse.com/view_webform_v2.js?u=Q0Lqu&webforms_id=52744202″ css=”on” center=”off” center_margin=”200″/]

 

If you wish a personal consultation with us, we have a special running until March 31, 2022 of 20% off the service fees. (Not the remedies or tinctures)

You can arrange that at our Consults Page

Coming in the next newsletter…

I’ve been working on a weight loss remedy, based in cellular energetics and upregulating basic metabolism and fat burning. I have it will several ‘testers’ now and will be able to tell you more soon. Sign Up Below to be notified when it’s ready:

[grwebform url=”https://app.getresponse.com/view_webform_v2.js?u=Q0Lqu&webforms_id=52742302″ css=”on” center=”off” center_margin=”200″/]

 

 

Vaccines – Why I Don’t Trust Them

Vaccines – Why I Don’t Trust Them..

Vaccines disrupt the whole immune system, leaving you far more susceptible to other diseases. Let me explain…

The innate immune system was developed to provide the you with an immediate response. The natural immune system is composed of three portions; the first line of defense is the mucous membranes of the respiratory, digestive, urinary and skin systems and works with the cell mediated immune system (Th1) to deal with the vast majority of pathogens.  Entry sites to the body via the skin, mucosal sites of the nasal/respiratory, oral/rectal, ocular, aural and urogenital is where the majority of trials for the immune system starts and most of the majority of pathogens never get by these natural barriers. The mucosal immunity has antiseptic patches of secretory immunoglobulins (IgA) to respond first. If the mucosal surfaces were actually penetrated then the IgE immunoglobulins came forth for the defense.

So it’s a one, two, pow-pow! Good-bye bugs.

The cell mediated responders have evolved to provide the acute inflammation response which is necessary in properly maturing the body’s immune system. This means that in fact, we are designed to be challenged with pathogens, let our first line of defense deal with it and grow some immune system ‘muscle’.

Without that, the majority of pathogens entering from these sites, the immune system does not reach maturity and therefore is unable to respond competently. So it actually needs to go through this process. The childhood rash-type diseases fulfill this purpose of immune system maturation.  Denied the ability to “mature” the immune system, the person is left with a dysfunctional immune response and genetic disease expression is altered.

Acute inflammation in the mature immune system can process and effectively clear the intruder or ‘bug’ in the majority of infections after that.

The hypothesis on how this takes place is via the nerve cells instructions to the cell mediated first line of defence’s polarity. Of course if the nerve cells are damaged from the vaccine or the aluminum or the mercury in the vaccines, this is one way the vaccines mess up the polarity of the immune response. And we KNOW that metals such as mercury and aluminum are neurologically very toxic.

The body needs to be able to focus on the correct form of response as the body deals with the pathogen. Later, after the invasion by pathogen has been cleared, the body then engages the humoral immunity (Th2) to recognize the pathogen and produces antibody against it for future use.

This part of the immune system is the acquired immune response which vaccinations were meant to augment. The humoral immunity makes the specific recognizing antibody after the body is over the acute inflammation so as not to exhaust the individual and prevent recovery.

Humoral immunity (Th2) unskewed system is a much different system designed to deal with pathogens or agents that might penetrate the skin bypassing the mucosal immunity ex; venoms from snakebites, poisons or toxins from bites, stings or deep punctures and microbial injection into areas of low oxygenation .The humoral system is capable of handling toxin and antigen inactivation, dealing with intracellular pathogens and direction of recognition via antibody production.

The natural immune system never evolved to see immune challenges enter the body like vaccines do, without going through our first line of defense. Rarely would a pathogen come into the immune system’s pristine internal environment of the blood only in the exceptions as above, bites, stings, poisons.

Humoral immunity was not designed to handle a myriad of pathogens this route, rather the humoral immunity is an internal deeper acting immune system for a lesser number of directly injected pathogens. And the main thing is that it has its limits. Vaccination programmes wear this out! The humoral system is made to respond to WAY more assaults via vaccination than it was ever meant to.  And it weakens..terribly.

Parental presentation of the pathogens via vaccination was not “good shepherding” practice and instead has been responsible for the improper wiring, signalling and biochemical pathway disruptions that make up many of the other disorders we now see so commonly today. Again, the wrench thrown into the dynamics of an evolutionarily successful system by manual manipulations not based on evolutionary pressure but by medical hubris. Although pleased with this intervention, man has remained incapable of understanding the chaos they have created. 

The complex immune system with the spread of genetic variability has served us well through the beginning of time. Unfortunately, about 100 years ago an adulteration and violation of the natural workings of the immune system took place.

This adulteration was the unnatural injection of unnatural pathogens that are not from the natural environment but rather a concoction of ingredients made artificially and mixed with toxic chemicals. Early on the recipe included embalming agents, later with heavy and light metals, and eventually with genetically engineered chimeras, man made monsters of unnatural origin.

Many of the viruses being injected into the bodies are genetically engineered and certainly not organic and so would never occur naturally. The vaccine has never been a natural pathogen of the natural environment and never a natural route of introduction and penetration of the host immune system.

Why would we not foresee the dys-regulation, dysfunction and the accompanied corresponding genetic compromises and hybridization that explain the growing number of health issues that have run parallel with the rise in vaccine number and use?

It’s simply a nightmare.

You Often Hear: Vaccines Decreased the Incidence Of Disease:

The rate of disease was NOT necessarily dropped by vaccines. In fact in many cases the disease had already dropped off by 90% BEFORE the vaccine came out! Measles vaccine introduced in 1963, but by 1958 the deaths and complications from measles had dropped drastically.

In Neil Z. Miller’s investigative book, he and Dr. Gary Goldman looked at 400 studies in medical, peer-reviewed literature questions not only the efficacy of vaccines, but the safety. Big time. Grampa’s Viagra was studied for years before release, but the Hep B vaccine put into very young children was only studied, loosely, for 4 months!

Something like measles is not a big deal here. But in third world countries, where clean water and sanitation is a huge problem and the people are malnourished, then that’s another story.

Studies show that Vitamin A in particular definitely lowers the rate of complications from viral disease.

He shows in his book that getting childhood diseases protects against more serious adult disease such as cancer, all types of cancer.

Getting the childhood diseases imparts a life long immunity, very strong versus when kids are vaccinated it’s a totally different immunity. When you’re vaccinated, you’re actually prevented from gaining that life long immunity and therefore the protection against cancer.

Also a large Japanese study of over 100K seniors showed that those who had contracted measles, mumps and chicken pox were in fact protected from cardio vascular disease such as atherosclerosis, strokes and heart attack.

Vaccines also only target one strain of a disease and in fact wind up enabling other strains to become stronger and more effective at causing illness. Because these other strains figure out how to survive better and become more aggressive.

For example,  pneumococcal vaccines target 7 strains…but there are 90 strains which now become stronger! So Prevnar was re-released in 2010 which included the original 7 and 6 additional strains. Still not going to do the job. In two years, the strains had mutated and the vaccine was no longer effective. It’s like an arms race…do one thing and someone else does something better..so you do another, etc., etc.

Drs and the CDC are telling parents, if you don’t vaccine, you’re responsible for spreading the disease. That’s BS. The scientists know it’s all about ‘evolutionary adaptation’. So particularly with pertussis, the microorganism becomes stronger and more virulent and the vaccine can’t touch it. That’s why they give ‘booster’ shots…because the vaccines are constantly becoming ineffective as the ‘bug’ mutates.

In a largely vaccinated population, it’s impossible to reach ‘herd immunity’. Why? If you look at any pathogen or germ, for want of a better word, it has the same drive to survive as we as humans do. And it has an immense ability to mutate in response to a challenged such as a vaccine. Then you have the problem of the mutated pathogen attacking both the vaccinated and unvaccinated population and new vaccines have to be developed. At best, even when new, any pertussis vaccine is only 60% effective, and that’s another problem yet to be solved. And even if you vaccinated 100% of the population, you can NOT achieve herd immunity with a vaccine that is only 60% effective at best! That’s what happens in a vaccinated environment.

In an unvaccinated environment, the pathogen becomes weaker, because the hosts (people) develop natural antibodies to weaken it and an unchallenged pathogen does not want to kill it’s host because then it also dies, so does not mutate in response to the natural production of antibodies over time and then herd immunity occurs. But as of now, this will never happen because of the large number of vaccinated in our population.

The base medical tenant is: “Vaccinate the population and it will be healthier.” Nothing could be further from the truth. Studies have been done comparing tens of thousands of people and children of vaccinated versus non-vaccinated groups and it shows without a doubt that the vaccinated group has the highest incidence of infant mortality. Right now, the USA has one of the highest rates of infant mortality in the world and has the highest number of mandatory vaccines for infants. (26 for each child up to 12 months of age!!) It’s clear as day in black and white. (Neil Z Miller, Dr. Gary Goldman) Infant Mortality Rate = Number of infant deaths per 1,000 live births. (Switzerland, Sweden and Iceland only require 12 for example and they have much better infant mortality rates.) Out of 34 countries looked at, the USA was #34…the worst. And yet, vaccines are administered to supposedly protect infants from getting sick and dying of infectious disease. A little counterproductive? Yeah, I think so.

More can be read at http://thinktwice.com  sNeil Z Miller’s site, and I highly recommend both of his books, which I’ve added to this page.

This is not going to end overnight. As of 2017 there are 275 new vaccines in the pipeline! And likely many more as I write this in March, 2022. So too much money and time is involved for Big Pharma to pull this plug.

There is a huge problem with Big Pharma being the industry for the most part which funds studies on vaccines and health. They totally influence which studies get published and scientists have been known to admit that they drop data points in their results when the study doesn’t show what Big Pharma wants the public to see.

To complicate this, Big Pharma is the biggest paying advertiser to mainstream media. This media makes approximately 70% of its income from pharmaceutical ads! So these media outlets would never publicize anything against vaccines which would cripple their income. It’s that simple.

In another  study Miller did with Dr. Goldman. They accessed the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. Note – When you purchase a vaccine for your child, a portion of that goes into a congressional fund to compensate families whose children are permanently damaged or killed by vaccines. As of 2017, over 3.6 BILLION had been paid out to compensate families. And yet the majority of cases are thrown out, so in actuality that fund should be more like 100 billion, as that is at least how many kids have suffered vaccine injury or death.

As a side note, these Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting systems grossly under report. Miller found out from a pharmaceutical company that did an internal review of its reporting system that these reports come in at the rate of 50 to 1. In other words, when you see a report of an injured or dead child, you need to multiply those number by 50!

This general reporting database has over 500,000 reported injuries and deaths and yet over 95% of doctors won’t report to it. So imagine what it would be like if all doctors did…as they are supposed to.

Even so, there are some 30,000 new reports or more each year. And just so you know, you don’t have to rely on your doctor to do it…parents can report too.

So Miller and Goldman accessed the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System and extracted the cases of 38.000 infants. Then they developed software which could tell them did the children have an adverse reaction after 2 or 3 vaccines or was it 4, 5, 6 ,7, or 8 before the adverse reaction occurred?

Infants receive 8 vaccines at 2, 4 and 6 months. The CDC says we can take any amount, even thousands. Does that make sense to you? When did you ever take 8 different drugs at once? As an adult? And we’re talking about infants here. Little beings whose immune systems haven’t even fully developed yet and won’t for about two years. And we’re going to inject them with all those diseases and toxins, all at once? It’s lunacy!

So to continue on the study. They only looked at the children who had serious adverse reactions. Not just pain at the injection site or developed a fever, but that were hospitalized or even die. The tipping point was 3. If a child received 3 vaccines at one time, they were found to be statistically and significantly more likely to be hospitalized or perish. And for each one more than that…4, 5, 6, 7 or 8 it was worse and worse. In fact at 8 the rates of damage were off the charts.

The CDC recommended schedule is for convenience. NOT safely. They’re afraid the parents won’t keep coming back time and time again to get single vaccines, so they group them like this and our children are the guinea pigs!

This study also showed that the younger the child receiving vaccines, the higher rate of adverse effects.

Toxicity concerns are aluminum and thimerosal (mercury). Thimerosal is still in flu vaccines and the cocktail they give pregnant women. Highly dangerous to the developing child.

Here is a video from Dr. Tapper who says in his practise there is NO cases of autism among the unvaccinated children! That should make you sit up and think!

https://drdeborahbaker.com/vid/Tapper.mp4

I could rant for pages, but this is a good start for the researching parent to help direct them to REAL information to make educated decisions. Below is a list of other sites I recommend you have a look at:

www.icandecide.org

www.childrenshealthdefense.org

www.physiciansforinformedconsent.org

www.hopeincacademy.org 

www.hopeforautism.com

www.theinformedmama.com

https://www.facebook.com/crazymothersorg/

https://vaccine.guide

www.learntherisk.org